Monday, UN climate change conference opens in Bonn Tuesday, the Security Council discusses Syria Wednesday, UN spokesman briefs press at Headquarters. Its a lot, right Its a lot. It is a firehose of news. How are we supposed to live our lives, cook a meal, uncrimp our hunchedover necks Even when I shut my. Follow These People on Twitter to Help You Understand the TrumpRussia Connection. Its a lot, right Its a lot. It is a firehose of news. How are we supposed to live our lives, cook a meal, uncrimp our hunched over necks Even when I shut my computer, it still flashes its little light in the corner, ready to alert me to the horrors of the world like some kind of pulsing Hellmouth. But one doesnt want to be uninformed So here is my solution, sort of, when I can restrain myself from nervously tapping and clicking my phone for new news, kind of like one does with a rosary, if a rosary also had the power to deliver jolts of terrified adrenaline I head on over to Twitter. But, instead of traveling aimlessly down that endless media highway, absorbing the random thoughts of random people of my totally un curated Twitter feed and thinking dimly thats interesting about how children should be bored in the summer or wow, that headline has the suffix according to science, so it must be true, or I dont think thats what treason means, Ive made a Twitter list that limits me to legal and political media types who seem to actually understand the TrumpRussianational security issues that are dominating the news. In addition to the accounts that everyone followsThe New York Times, The Washington Post, Maggie Haberman, Preet Bharara, etc. I glance at this short list a few times a day to keep me up to date. Take a look NB This wont necessarily reduce the amount of time you spend onlinethese people are prolific tweeters, writers, lawyers, and podcasters, and even just this smallish group could send you down some winding Twitter rabbit holes. Have other suggestionsLeave them in the comments and Ill adjust my list on Twitter. Benjamin Wittes is the co founder and editor in chief of Lawfare, which is devoted to the discussion of hard national security choices itself worth following lawfareblog. He was an editorial writer for the Washington Post for nine years and is now a senior fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution. His feed serves as both informationentertainment on its own and as an excellent shunt toward other legal tweeters. Chafetz is law professor at Cornell and author of the forthcoming Congresss Constitution Legislative Authority and the Separation of Powers. According to Steve Vladeck, the editor in chief of Just Security see below, hes particularly good on the powers and role of Congress. Abramson is an attorney and professor of English at UNH and is apparently devoting his every waking moment to explaining stuff on Twitter. He has 1. 18. K followers, so I guess a lot of other people need these explanations, too. I like his lengthy threads explaining complicated matters in short sentences, because heyif I had any kind of attention span I wouldnt be on Twitter in the first place. Heres the start of an epic thread tweet, this one on criminal versus non criminal investigations A site dedicated to law, rights, and national security. Its co editor in chief, stevevladeck, a law professor at UT, is also worth following, as are others associated with Just Security, like Ryan Goodman at rgoodlaw. Vladeck calls Goodman good for random criminal statutes. I like Just Security for commentary on international events, especially when my attention is so glued to Washington. Goldsmith is a Harvard Law prof, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, and a co founder of Lawfare. His laconic commentary isnt especially hilarious, but then, what is hilarious about national security these days But his annotations on current events media alert me to what stories arent getting enough attention, as well as longer form commentary for perspective. Finally, a brief shout out to Matt Tait pwnallthethings. Tait writes primarily about cybersecurity, but Benjamin Wittes notes that he also follows Tait for stuff in the legalpoliticalsecurity area too. And with that, I leave you with this tweet. Need Selfie Tips Ask a Neural Network. In my salad days I posted some supremely unflattering selfies. 1999 Viking Popup Camper Manual. Jurnal Stoikiometri Pdf. I was a photo newbie, a bearded amateur mugging for the camera. Im happy to say that the results of my self portraits shared below purely for educational purposes, of course have improved through experience, but if I had a ruthless robot telling me where I was going wrong it wouldve been a lot easier. Luckily, the magic of machine learning is now upon us, and its here to tell us how to take a good selfie. Thanks to Stanford Ph. D. student Andrej Karpathy and the aid of a neural network, you can see what separates a good selfie from a bad one, and figure out why some selfies pop and others fizzle. Karpathy began with a convolutional neural network, an artificial neural network designed to mimic a visual cortex. He then fed the network 2 million selfies, separating them into good and bad selfies based on followers as well as the number of likes. Karpathy then used a new dataset of 5. When an app claims to be powered by artificial intelligence it feels like youre in the future. Read more Read. The difference between the best and worst selfies is pretty striking, but there are patterns among each category that you should definitely keep in mind when snappin for the gram. How to Take a Good Selfie. Let your hair out Photos showing off your flowing locks are generally ranked higher than photos lacking in the hair department. The top 1. 00 selfies in the sorted dataset dont include a single male, but the top selfies for men indicate that styled hair is definitely in. Get faded Photos with slightly faded and oversaturated faces are seen as more appealing and uniform compared to their undersaturated counterparts. The best selfies were bright, while the worst were consistently underlit. Filters, filters, filters Nearly every top ranked selfie had a filter overlay, with the majority of filters reducing contrast and fading the image itself. Chalk it up to that nostalgic look, perhaps Ditch the forehead Whether intentional or otherwise, a surprisingly large amount of good selfies are missing a chunk of the subjects head. Contrary to what you might think, the best selfies arent the most raunchy. In fact, there was little correlation between the amount of skin showing and the quality of the selfie. How to Take a Bad Selfie. Fill the photo We get it, its a selfie. But if your head looks like its about to engulf the entire frame, maybe move your camera back a bit, but remember to lean your head forward and down a little bit. Leave some room, if only to let the world know you have a neck. Take a group shot More people equals more likes, right Well, not really. Bootstrap 3 Admin Template Github. Only one group selfie was in the top 1. Getting the right angle for a group photo is also pretty hard without some light human contortion. Shoot in the dark poorly lit photos suck, and selfies are no exception. The worst photos were consistently dark or underexposed, and as a result full of noise that distracted from the subject.